California High Court Says Contract Illegibility Warrants Increased Substantive Scrutiny
Seyfarth Synopsis: The California Supreme Court held that illegibility and tiny font are matters of procedural, not substantive, unconscionability. However, courts must closely scrutinize the terms of hard-to-read agreements for unfairness, and ambiguities in such adhesive contracts (such as arbitration agreements) should be resolved against the drafter. Fuentes v. Empire Nissan, Inc. The Facts When applying to work at Empire Nissan, Evangelina Fuentes signed an “Applicant Statement and Agreement” that…

